Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111470 (PAT)

Umesh Rajak @ Umessh Rajak v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./45022/2025 · 2025-11-10

Nawneet Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45022 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2024 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Umesh Rajak @ Umessh Rajak S/o Raj Kumar Baitha R/o Village- Bhorsar, PS- Katoria, District- Banka 2. Sunita Devi W/o Umesh Rajak @ Umessh Rajak R/o Village- Bhorsar, PS- Katoria, District- Banka 3. Mala Devi W/o Pappu Rajak R/o Village- Bhorsar, PS- Katoria, District- Banka 4. Jaso Devi W/o Mahendra Rajak R/o Village- Bhorsar, PS- Katoria, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Katoriya P.S. Case No. 259 of 2024 registered under Sections 126(2), 109(1), 74, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. 3. Allegedly, while the informant was going to his Bathan for bringing meal, in the way, the co-accused Chhotu Rajak assaulted the informant by lathi. It is further alleged that on the next day, i.e. 31-10-2024, the accused-petitioners and co- accused persons came and assaulted the informant, his sons and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45022 of 2025(4) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 his daughter-in-law by axe, lathi and rod. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. They are the persons of clean antecedent. There is case and counter case between the parties. The injuries are simple in nature. 5. On the otherhand, Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 259 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. A.K.V.//- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T