105 + 225 V S PANDEY THE INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Mr. DK Singal, Advocate for the respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) CM-15861-CWP 1. The instant application has been moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for withdrawal of the writ petition on account of the amicable settlement. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main cas 3. CM stands disposed of. Main Case 1. The present petition has been filed under Article Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order major penalty without holding enquiry and thereafter, order rejecting appeal dated 30.06.2008 (P imposing major penalty without holding enquiry and lo illegalities committed against the rules of IFCI Staff Regulations. 2. In view of order passed in CM dismissed as withdrawn. 03.11.2025 NainaRajput Whether speaking/reason Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS THE INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. DK Singal, Advocate for the respondents. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) CWP-2025 The instant application has been moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for withdrawal of the writ petition on account of the amicable settlement. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is taken on board today itself. CM stands disposed of. The present petition has been filed under Article Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of removal from service dated 31.07.2007 (P major penalty without holding enquiry and thereafter, order rejecting appeal dated 30.06.2008 (P-2) against removal order without passing speaking order i.e. imposing major penalty without holding enquiry and lo illegalities committed against the rules of IFCI Staff Regulations. In view of order passed in CM-15861 ismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-15861-CWP-2025 IN/AND CWP-18520-2011 Date of Decision: 03.11.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) THE INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD AND ANR ….RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. DK Singal, Advocate for the respondents. The instant application has been moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for withdrawal of the writ petition on account of For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed e is taken on board today itself. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari service dated 31.07.2007 (P-1) i.e. imposing major penalty without holding enquiry and thereafter, order rejecting appeal 2) against removal order without passing speaking order i.e. imposing major penalty without holding enquiry and looking into various illegalities committed against the rules of IFCI Staff Regulations. 15861-CWP-2025, the main case is (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE Yes/No :Yes/No 2025 2011 Date of Decision: 03.11.2025 ….PETITIONER(S) ….RESPONDENT(S) The instant application has been moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for withdrawal of the writ petition on account of For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari 1) i.e. imposing major penalty without holding enquiry and thereafter, order rejecting appeal 2) against removal order without passing speaking order i.e. oking into various 2025, the main case is NAINA KATHIAT 2025.11.06 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document