SOBIA ARIF v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1716/2024 · 2025-09-17
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11146 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11146 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 67
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1716/2024
Sobia Arif
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate.
V/s
UT of J&K and Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Nirmal Kotwal, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG Mr. Shiekh Najeeb, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
17.09.2025
1. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the tentative selection list on the ground that the said tentative list prepared by the respondents is not in terms of the conditions of advertisement notice. The final selection list is yet to be published. Before publishing any select list, objections if any to the tentative list, are required to be considered and decide.
2. It is the submission of Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate appearing counsel for the petitioner that since the tentative select list does not conform to the conditions of the advertisement notice and tentative select list being not in accordance with it, therefore, she having filed objections/representation before issuing the select list. All the objections raised by petitioner in the representation are required to be considered and is required to be heard by the authority before whom, such representation is submitted. This is the only grievance of the petitioner in this petition.
__________ p. 2 3. At this stage, with the consent of both the parties, this petition is
disposed of by directing the respondents, that before finalizing the selection list they shall consider the objections raised by the petitioner and shall also hear the petitioner before taking such decision. Any party aggrieved of the said decision, so taken, shall be at liberty to take re-course to the remedy as is available to them under law. In case the petitioner wants to produce some documents in support of her stand same that may be taken into account. On taking the decision interim directions shall stands vacated.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul)
Judge
Jammu: 17.09.2025 Javid Iqbal