IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.215 RSA-2054-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.12.2025 NARESH KUMAR & ORS ...Appellants Versus KIRPAL SINGH AND ANR. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- None for the appellants. Mr. Rajbir Wasu, Advocate for respondent No.1. Service of respondent No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 16.07.2001. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the appellants, despite due intimation. Even on the last date of hearing, none had made appearance on behalf of the appellants. It appears that appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 09.12.2025 JUDGE Anu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANU 2025.12.10 16:36 I am the author of this document Chandigarh 215 V/S ANU 2025.12.10 16:36 I am the author of this document Chandigarh