Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11145 (GAU)

ALOM ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/383/2025 · 2025-04-23

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010083862025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/383/2025 ALOM ALI S/O. LT. SOLEMAN SK. R/O. VILL. KAIMMATI, P/S. GOLAKGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM.ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MD A RAHMAN, SAMIM RAHMAN,MR A W AMAN,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, In Case : Bail Appln./927/2025 ALOM ALI S/O. LT. SOLEMAN SK. R/O. VILL. KAIMMATI P/S. GOLAKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM.ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 24.04.2025 1. Heard Md. A. Rahman, the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the petitioner, seeking correction of inadvertent typographical mistake which has crept in the order dated 09.04.2025, passed by this Court in Bail Application No. 927/2025. 3. It appears that in the said order, inadvertently, it was mentioned that the petitioner was allowed to go on bail of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Kamrup(M), instead of the learned Special Judge, Kokrajhar. 4. As the aforesaid error appears to be an inadvertent typographical mistake, same needs to be rectified. 5. Therefore, it is hereby ordered that the reference to the learned Special Judge, Kamrup(M), in the Bail Order dated 09.04.2025, passed in Bail Application No. 927/2025 shall be read as the learned Special Judge, Kokrajhar. Page No.# 3/3 6. This Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant