M/S M & M JEWELS AND ANOTHER v. M/S JAI DIAMONDS AND ANOTHER
RSA/2074/2024 · 2025-11-11
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 111429 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 111429 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-2074- IN THE HIG 292
M/s M&M J
M/s Jia Diam (wrongly me
CORAM: H
Present: - NIDHI GUP
1.
against the the suit for
2.
telephonic in now stands between the District Cou the learned E by learned c filed by the the basis of accordingly, permitted to
3.
-2024
-1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
RSA
Date o
&M Jewels and another
Versus Diamonds and another
gly mentioned as M/s Jai Diamonds in M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate fo
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The appellant-defendants No. 1 concurrent findings rendered by b for recovery filed by respondent-plai
At the very outset, learned co onic instructions submits that the prese tands settled by way of compromise en the parties before the Mediation t Courts, Chandigarh. A copy of orde rned Executing Court, Chandigarh, rned counsel for appellants vide wh y the respondent/Decree-Holders, wa sis of aforesaid compromise. The sa ingly, prayed by learned counsel for tted to withdraw the present second app
Permitted to do so.
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2074-2024 Date of Decision: 11.11.2025
.… Appellants
.... Respondents nds in the memo of parties)
NIDHI GUPTA cate for the appellants. No. 1 and 2 are in second appeal ed by both the Court below whereby plaintiffs was decreed. ned counsel for the appellants on e present was a money decree which romise dated 07.07.2025 arrived at iation and Conciliation Centre at f order dated 29.07.2025, passed by arh, has been handed over in Court de which the execution application rs, was dismissed as withdrawn on The same is taken on record. It is el for the appellants that he may be nd appeal. peal reby on hich d at
d by ourt tion on It is be RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.14 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
RSA-2074-
4.
5.
6.
₹10,000/- present seco appellants.
7.
8.
Free of ₹ identification
11.11.2025 rishu
-2024
-2-
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, s
At this stage, learned counsel f has been affixed by the appell t second appeal. It is prayed that the
Ordered accordingly.
Registry is directed refund the ₹10,000/- to the appellants a ication, in accordance with law/Rules. 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
any, shall also stand disposed of. unsel for the appellant submits that appellants as Court Fee upon the at the same may be refunded to the nd the aforesaid amount of Court ants against proper receipt and Rules.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No that the the ourt and RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.14 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.