Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108694 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 312 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bahadur Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Neelam Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Adya Prasad Tewari,Avinash Chandra Srivastava,C.S.C.,Devesh Mishra Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The writ petition arises out of proceedings instituted under Section 9A (2) of U.P. C.H. Act. The private respondents have filed their objections. The Consolidation Officer, Mainpuri by the impugned order dated 09.09.1997 has held that there is no delay in filing the objections. The aforesaid order has been confirmed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. There is no infirmity in the impugned orders. The impugned orders do not warrant any interference. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings may be decided expeditiously. Learned Standing Counsel does not raise any serious objection to the aforesaid. Shri Adya Prasad Tewari, learned counsel for the private respondents submits that the matter is liable to be decided on merits as per law. In wake of the preceding discussions, the Consolidation Officer, Mainpuri is directed to decide the proceedings under Section 9A (2) of U.P. C.H. Act as per law in expeditious manner preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation after hearing all the parties. It is open to the petitioner to raise all the objections as regards jurisdiction of the authority before the Consolidation Officer as per law. In case such objections are raised, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Jaswant Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad