Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11137 (KAR)

SHANKRAMMA AND ORS v. GOURAMMA AND ORS

RSA/200428/2024 · 2025-07-09

Ravi V Hosmani

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3771 RSA No. 200428 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 200428 OF 2024 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SHANKRAMMA W/O SANGAMESH, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: SINDHANUR, TQ: SINDHANUR, DIST: RAICHUR. 2. SHARANABASAVA S/O MALLANNA, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SANTEKELLUR VILLAGE, TQ: MASKI, DIST: RAICHUR. 3. AYYANAGOUDA S/O MALLANNA, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SANTEKELLUR VILLAGE, TQ: MASKI, DIST: RAICHUR. 4. AMAREGOUDA S/O MALLANNA, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: SANTEKELLUR VILLAGE, TQ: MASKI, DIST: RAICHUR. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MAHANTESH PATIL, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3771 RSA No. 200428 of 2024 AND: 1. GOURAMMA W/O ADANNA HONNALLI, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: SARJAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: LINGASUGURU, DIST: RAICHUR. 2. MALLANNA S/O RUDRAGOUDA MALIPATIL, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED, R/O: AMARAVATHI VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT SANTEKELLUR VILLAGE, TQ: LINGASUGUR, DIST: RAICHUR. 3. PARVATEMMA W/O SHANKRAPPA MALIPATIL, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: AMARAVATHI VILLAGE, TQ: LINGASUGURU, DIST: RAICHUR. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.01.2024 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAICHUR SITTING AT SINDHANUR, ITINERARY AT LINGASUGUR IN R.A.NO.39/2022 AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.06.2022 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE J.M.F.C., AT LINGASUGUR IN O.S.NO.39/2018 INSOFAR AS ALLOTTING SHARE OF PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED FOR 1/3RD SHARE. THE PARVATHEMMA BEING A LEGAL HEIR OF SHANKARAPPA IS ENTITLED FOR 1/3RD SHARE, THE DEFENDANT NO.1, 3 TO 6 TOGETHER ENTITLED FOR 1/3RD SHARE I.E, THE DEFENDANT NO.1, 3 TO 6 EACH ENTITLED FOR 1/15TH SHARE IN THE SUIT PROPERTIES AND PROPERTY MENTIONED IN THE ‘B’ SCHEDULE AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SUIT OF PLAINTIFF. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3771 RSA No. 200428 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for fifth time, none appears. It was passed over and called again. There is no representation. This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE NB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 Ct: Vk