Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11134 (UTT)

AKASH AGARWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/395/2018 · 2025-04-21

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSB No. 395 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. D.S. Bora, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. In this petition, petitioner has challenged Government Order dated 01.03.2018. By the said Government Order, it was provided that the doctors, who have executed a bond while pursuing medical education, will have to serve for requisite length of service in Government hospitals at remote places, and the services rendered by them as Senior Resident, will not be counted towards the bonded service. 4. Since the writ petition was filed in 2018 and the petitioner would have been appointed as doctor in a hospital, therefore, the challenge to the condition mentioned in the impugned Government Order, do not survive any longer. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 21.04.2025 Navin