Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111327 (ALL)

KUVAR BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/20027/2024 · 2025-02-13

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20402 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20027 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kuvar Bahadur Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indresh Kumar Singh,Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. Civil Misc. Impleadment Application No. 3 of 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Implead application is allowed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead "Ranno Devi" as respondent no. 4 during the course of the day. Order on Order Sheet 1. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2, Director, Panchayat Raj to take decision regarding the appointment of the petitioner on compassionate grounds and further grant appointment on compassionate ground to the petitioner within a period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court otherwise petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no. 2 for redressal of his grievance and further a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the same within a stipulated time for which learned standing counsel has no objection. 3. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No. 2 within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the same in accordance with U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness rules 1974 or any other rules occupying the field, maximum within a period of eight weeks thereafter after providing full opportunity of rebuttal to respondent no. 4. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad