APHC010614402016 Sjiia IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AA/IARAVATI ■ISlT THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND honourable SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR LA.A.S.Nos.409, 425. 427, 429 of 2Q1fi land acquisition appeal suit No.4n9 Appeal flied under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 587 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Ailagadda, Kurnool District. Between: RAO and 11 of 2017 of 2016 Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition Nandyal, Kurnool District. Telugu Ganga Project, ■..Appellant/Referring Officer AND Kasirami Reddy, S/o. Pedda Venkata Reddy, age 50 years R/o Bachapuram Village, H/o. G. Jambuladinne, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant jA NO: 2 OF 2016 fLAASMP 1180 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 of CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in OP No.587/2012 dated 19.01.2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Ailagadda, Kurnool District. : Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent : Smt Savithh Devi APHC010126432016' LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.425 of 2016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 586 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Sagili Mohan Reddy, S/o. Dastagiri Reddy, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant IA NO: 2 OF 2016fLAASMP 1204 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in LAOP No.586 of 2012 dated 19.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. : Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent : Smt Savithri Devi APHC010277582016 ;■ land acquisition appeal suit Nn 477 nf 2016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 589 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/ Referring Officer AND Chinthala Jeevaratnam, S/o.Swamy Das, Age 60 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016(LAASMP 1206 OF 201 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order No.589 of 2012 dated 19.01.2016 Kurnool District. passed in LAOP on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Counsel for the Appellant : Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals) Counsel for the Respondent : Smt Savithri Devi A APHC010126132016 LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.429 of 2016 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Aot, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 592 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/ Referring Officer AND N Suresh Reddy, S/o.N.Pulla Reddy, Age 30 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandai, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016(LAASMP 1208 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in LAOP No.592/2012 dated 19.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. : Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent : Smt Savithri Devi APHC010580742017 LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.11 of 2017 Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 588 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/ Referring Officer AND Valembu, W/o. Hussain Peera, R/o. Manda'uru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2017(LAASMP 29 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OP No.588/2012 dated 19.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. : Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals) Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for the Respondent : Smt Savithri Devi The Court made the following order: 1 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_409_2016 & batch APHC010742722015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos: 409, 425, 427. 429 of 2016 an_d 11 of 2017 LAAS No.409 of 2016 Between: 1. The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT AND 1. Kasirami Reddy, S/o.Pedda Venkata Reddy, Aged 50 years, R/o.Bachapuram Village, H/o.G.Jambuladinne, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: 1. Mr.Balia Ravindranath 2. Smt.Savithri Devi I 2 .!>• ■ WS, J & TRR, J LAAS_409_2016 & batch The Cqurt made the following Comrnon Judgment; (PerHomiesnjustic eMnaiaJayasurya) Heard Mr.T.S.Rayalu, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. Also heard Smt.Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the respondents / claimants, who appeared through on line. Aggrieved by a L.A.O.P.No.586, 587, 588, 589 and 592 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Judge, Allagadda, the State preferred the present batch of 19.01.2016 in the Common Order dated 2. Senior Civil appeals. The respondents herein are the claimants in the said O.Ps. of excavation of 40-L Sub-Minor Distributory in Block 3. For the purpose No.21 of Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, the Special Deputy Collector / Land Acquisition Officer issued a Notification dated 30.12.2008 under Sectipn 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for acquisition of land of an extent of Ac.10.70 cents in the village limits of Muthalur and Mandal belonging to the respondents / Mandalur Villages, Rudravaram Draft Declaration under Section 6 of the Act was also claimants. The published on 30.12.2008. Thereafter, the Land Acquisition Officer by conducting Award enquiry, classified the lands into two categories i.e., (i) rain- (ii) lands under bore well irrigation and fixed the market value @ fed lands, Rs.45,000/- and Rs.50,000/- per acre respectively. The respondents / claimants while receiving the compensation under protest, sought reference under Section 18 of the Act. the Reference Court, the. respondents claimed an amount of and in support of their case, examined 4. Before Rs.2,00,000/- per acre 3 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS 409 2016 & batch P.Ws.1 (claimant in O.P.No.586 of 2012) to P.W.3 and got marked Exs.AI- Certified Copy of the Sale Deed dated 16.06.2003 and Ex.A2-Rudravaram Mandal Map issued by Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), S.R.B.C., Nandyal. On behalf of the Referring Officer, no oral evidence was adduced. Attested Copy of the Award No.13/2010-11 dated 31.07.2010 in respect of the lands in question was marked as Ex.BI. The Reference Court, on an ajDpreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, enhanced the compensation in respect of subject lands to 5. Rs.1,24,000/-. Mr.T.S.Rayalu, the learned Government Pleader, vehemently contends that the enhancement of the compensation by the Reference Court is without any valid basis. He submits that the respondents / claimants have not 6. adduced any cogent evidence to substantiate their claim for enhancement of the compensation. He argues that Ex.A1-Sale transaction dated 16.06.2003 is in respect of the lands situated in altogether a different village i.e., Chinna r Kambaluru village, and even according to the respondents / claimants, the distance between the said village and the subject matter lands under acquisition situated in Muthalur and Mandalur Villages is about 10 Kms. Therefore, the said sale transaction ought not have been takfen into consideration and the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer by taking the sale statistics at the time of Award enquiry ought not have been interfered with by the Reference Court. Making the said submissions, the learned counsel urges for allowing the appeals. r'- ■i f ■ A/JS, J & TRR, J LAAS_409_2016 & batch On the other hand, Smt.Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the respondents / claimants appearing through on line made submissions to sustain the order of the Reference Court. She contends that the Reference Court considered both the oral and documentary evidence in the proper perspective and in the light of the settled legal position referred to in the order under challenge, no interference is called for by this Court in the present appeals. 7. This Court has considered the submissions made and the point that arises for consideration is ; Whether the fixation of market value by the Reference Court vide Common Order under challenge warrants interference 8. by this Court as the same is excessive? 9. At the outset, it may be appropriate to mention that hundreds of acres of land situated in different villages of Kurnool District were acquired for the of the Telugu Ganga Project. Most of these villages are contiguous purpose and nature of the land in most of these villages is similar. Be that as it may As noted earlier, seeking enhancement of the compensation in respect of the subject matter lands, the claimants got examined P.W.1 (claimant in L.A.O.P.No.586 of 2012) and P.Ws.2 and 3. They relied on Ex.AI dated 16.06.2003 which is in respect of land situated at Chinna Kambaluru Village, wherein an extent of Ac.0.50 cents was sold for Rs.40,000/- which works out to Rs.80,000/- per acre. In the claim statement before the Reference Court, i respondents / claimants stated that the fixation of market value is too low, that the Land Acquisition Officer was not correct in making the classification of 10. the 5 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_409_2016 & batch lands and that it is proper to fix the market value @ Rs.2,00,000/ P-W.1 filed affidavit in lieu of chief examination - per acre, supporting the contents of the Deed dated version of P.W.1. Most importantly, P.W.2, whose jurisdiction extends to Muthalur claim statement. P.W.3 16.06.2003(Ex.A1) supported the one of the attestors to the Sale the Mandal Agricultural Officer Mandaluru Villages, wherein the wherein Ex.A1 land having similar crop pattern, productivity and subject lands and Chinna Kambaluru village are situated.' categorically deposed that the said lands are and the market value. Nothing contra examination of P.Ws.1 to 3. It is also brought was elicited in the cross record that the said villages However, no contra evidence on are situated within a distance of 10 Kms. radius. was adduced either oral behalf of the Referring Officer, in the absence of which, the to be fixed on the basis of the evidence adduced documentary on or compensation has by the claimants. 11. At this juncture, the contention Pleader with regard to the sales raised by the learned Government statistics relied on by the Land Acquisition Officer may also be referred to. However, it is settled law that unless the sale transactions forming basis for fixation of compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer are exhibited, the though a reference Therefore, same cannot be treated as evidence was made in the Award(See: 1988 (3) SCO 751). mere marking of Ex.Bf-Award in the absence of oral and documentary evidence supporting the fixation Acquisition Officer would not of market value by the Land enure to the benefit of the State. Be that as it may. 6 NJS, J & TRR, J ■ LAAS 409 2016 & batch 12. In the land acquisition matters, the Law is well settled that the Court is required to fix the just and reasonable compensation. 13. In the present case, to substantiate their claim for enhancement, the respondents / claimants placed reliance on Ex.AI-Registered Sale Deed dated 16.06.2003. The sale transaction is in respect of an extent of Ac.0.50 cents ( 72 acre) for Rs.40,000/- which took place more than 5 72 years prior to the issuance of Section 4 (1) Notification dated 30.12.2008 in respect of the subject matter lands. In the absence of any contra material on record adduced ' by the Referring Officer, the Court has no option except to take the said Sale " Deed into consideration, by taking the time gap of 5 72 years. In Omprakash and Ors., v. Union of lhdia\ the Hon’ble Supreme Court opined that 12% value appreciation per annum, in the attending facts and circumstances can be taken into consideration. Therefore, by taking the time gap of 5 72 years and the value appreciation @ 12% p.a., the market value of the subject matter lands on the basis of Ex.AI would come to Rs. 1,49,447/-, which is more than the market value fixed by the Reference ^Court @ Rs.1,20,000/- / i 14. per acre. However, no cross objections are preferred by the respondents / claimants. Though the subject matter lands are categorized into rain-fed lands and irrigated dry lands under bore well, going by the evidence on record, more particularly P.W.2-Agricultural Officer and the potentiality of the acquired lands which are suitable for both commercial and AIR 2004 SC 4135 , 7 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_409_2016 & batch of Telugu Ganga Project / Distributory canals, fixation of in the considered opinion food crops by virtue compensation uniformly @ Rs.1,24,000/- per acre of this Court is just and reasonable. Accordingly, the point is answered. Having considered the matter in its entirety, there are no grounds to interfere with the well reasoned order of the learned Reference Court. In the aforesaid view of the matter, the appeals fail and the same are Consequently, the Miscellaneous 15. 16. accordingly dismissed. No costs. Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. \ Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District, (with Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals), High Court of Andhra 1. The Civil Judge (Senior records if any) 2. Two CCs to : Pradesh. [OUT] 3. OneCCto Smt Savithri Devi, Advocate [OPUC] proHpqh at 4 The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records) 5. Two CD Copies TK \ nm u>>>’ HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT + DECREE LAAS Nos.409, 425, 427, 429 of 2016 & 11 of 2017 I 2 MUG 2025 ^ . Current Section ,5? m 69 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITS APHC010614402016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ■lil THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.409 of 2016 Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Kasirami Reddy, S/o. Pedda Venkata Reddy, age 50 years, R/o. Bachapuram Village, H/o. G. Jambuiadinne, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 587 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals), Advocate for the Appellant and of Smt Savithri Devi, Advocate for the Respondent. This Court doth order and decree as follows: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit be and is hereby dismissed. That there be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal Suit. 2. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER S To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. Two CD Copies 2. TK HIGH COURT TK NJS.J & TRR.J DATED:10/07/2025 DECREE '5? ANDI^J^ J n AUG ZDK ^ . C«rn«( Stciwn ^ at LAAS No.409 of 2016 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT APHC010126432016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY. THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.425 of 201 fi Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Referring Officer AND Sagili Mohan Reddy, S/o. Dastagiri Reddy, R/o. Mandaluru Village Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 586 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals), Advocate for the Appellant and of Smt Savithri Devi, Advocate for the Respondent. This Court doth order and decree as follows: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal Suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies TK HIGH COURT TK NJS,J & TRR,J DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE ; 2 0 AUG 2025 i ^ Current Section spatcvv55<^ |5 LAAS No.425of 2016 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT APHC010277582016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.427 of 2016 Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/ Referring Officer AND Chinthala Jeevaratnam, S/o.Swamy Das, Age 60 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 589 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals), Advocate for the Appellant and of Smt Savithri Devi, Advocate for the Respondent. This Court doth order and decree as follows: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. Thatthere be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal Suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTB^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District 2. Two CD Copies TK HIGH COURT NJS,J TK & TRR.J DATED:10/07/2025 decree 5 2 fl AUG 2025 LAAS No. 427 of 2016 .09, Current Section . DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT APHC010126132016 0S0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY. THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR LAND ACQUISITIDN APPEAL SUIT No.429 of 701 fi RAO Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Nandyal, Kurnool District. Project, ...Appellant/ Referring Officer AND N Suresh Reddy, S/o.N.Pulla Reddy, Age Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. 30 years, R/o.Mandaluru ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool against the passed in LAOP No. 592 of 2012 and District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court and the material papers in T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals), Smt Savithri Devi, Advocate for the the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Advocate for the Appellant and of Respondent. rhis Court doth order and decree as follows: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal Suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECtfON OFFICER To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda, Kurnool District. Two CD Copies 2. TK HIGH COURT NJS,J tk & trr.j DATED:10/07/2025 decree LAAS No.429 of 2016 ( DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION appeal SUIT APHC010580742017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.11 of 2017 Between: Special Deputy Collector-Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/ Referring Officer AND Valembu, W/o. Hussain Peera, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, against the Order and Decree dated 19-01-2016 passed in LAOP No. 588 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.S.Rayalu (GP for Appeals), Advocate for the Appellant and of Smt Savithri Devi, Advocate for the Respondent. This Court doth order and decree as follows; 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal Suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal Suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Allagadda 2. Two CD Copies Kurnool District. TK p HIGH COURT TK NJS,J & TRR.J DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE g 2 n AUG 2025 X. -A- Currein section * ^ m LAAS No.11 of 2017 P>. DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT