Sri. Mitam Debbarma v. Tripura Publci Service Commission and 2 Ors.
WP(C)/417/2025 · 2025-08-02
S Datta Purkayastha
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1113 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1113 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No.417 of 2025 Sri Mitam Debbarma
...... Petitioner(s)
V E R S U S
Tripura Public Service Commission and others
...... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankar Bhattacharjee, Advocate.
Mr. Subendu Noatia, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, Advocate.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA _O_R_D_E_R_ 02/08/2025
Heard Mr. Sankar Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Raju Datta, learned counsel has entered appearance for all the respondents.
During hearing, Mr. Sankar Bhattacharjee, learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw from this writ petition as the petitioner is required to take some other steps for filing petition for review of his answer script or application under RTI Act etc. to the respondents. Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel also seeks for liberty to submit a fresh writ petition, if the grievances of the petitioner still persists.
Considered.
The writ petition is disposed of being withdrawn with such liberty as indicated above.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
JUDGE
Rudradeep RUDRADEEP BANERJEE Digitally signed by RUDRADEEP BANERJEE Date: 2025.08.04 16:17:48 +05'30'