SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:8347 WPCRL No.1025 of 2025 with (Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2025) Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners alongwith compounding application and the same is supported with the affidavits of petitioners and respondent nos.3 & 4. 5. Petitioners as well as respondent nos.3 & 4 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsel. 6. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners Nawab Singh, son of Shri Lakhwinder Singh, Mahenda Singh, son of Shri Veer Singh, Harjeet Singh @ Kaka, son of Shri Mahendra Singh and Vikram Singh, son of Shri Mukhtayar Singh have sought quashing of the impugned FIR dated 30.08.2025 being FIR No.169 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 332(c), 351(2) & 352 of BNS, 2023 registered at P.S. Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar qua the petitioners. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. This Court has interacted with the parties. While interacting with the parties it seems to be a minor altercation between the parties and now the matter has been settled, therefore, the ground for compounding application are sufficient to be allowed. 9. Learned State counsel opposed the compounding application and submits that some of the offences are not compoundable. 10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 11. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 12. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The impugned FIR dated 30.08.2025 being FIR No.169 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 332(c), 351(2) & 352 of BNS, 2023 registered at P.S. Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar qua the petitioners are hereby quashed. 13. Accordingly instant Criminal Misc. Application stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 18.09.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.09.19 16:58:09 +05'30'