Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11122 (UTT)

KIRTI GUPTA v. ARBITRATOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR

WPMS/2641/2025 · 2025-09-10

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:8012 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2641 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. Anil Dabral, learned Additional C.S.C. with Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/respondent No.1. 3. Mr. Naresh Pant, learned counsel for the respondent No.2/N.H.A.I., appeared through V.C. 4. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners for a direction to learned District Judge, Haridwar, to decide the Misc. Case No.102 of 2023 Smt. Kirti Gupta and Ors. Vs. Arbitrator and Anr., under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pending before the learned District Judge, Haridwar, expeditiously or within stipulated period. 5. From perusal of the record, it transpires that though the aforesaid Misc. Case has been filed by the petitioners on 23.11.2023, but, till date, the service has not been effected upon the respondents. 6. Today, both the respondents are before this Court through their respective counsel. Now, learned counsel for the respondents undertake that respondents shall put in their appearance before the learned District Judge, Haridwar in Misc. Case No.102 of 2023 Smt. Kirti Gupta and Ors. Vs. Arbitrator and Anr., on the next date fixed i.e. 22.09.2025. 7. In view of the above, present writ is disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 10.09.2025 PN