Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11119 (AP)

Smt.Challa Rajya Lakshmi, v. The State of A.P.,

WP/5592/2019 · 2025-07-20

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010127422019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5592/2019 Between: 1. SMT.CHALLA RAJYA LAKSHMI,, W/O.VALLEPU SRINU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O.HARIPRASADA NAGAR, NEAR RAILWAY OVER BRIDGE, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, EDUCATION, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, SCHOOL EDUCATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5592 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, direction or order more so a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No.970/PS-1/2017, dated 22.02.2019 and consequential proceedings of the 4th Respondent in Rc.No.9565/B5/2017, dated 22.03.2019 as illegal and in contravention of the Judgment rendered by the Hon’ble High Court in WP.No.9503/2005, WP.No.22580/2010 and Batch, dated 13.07.2013 and also to declare the proceedings of 2nd respondent in Rc.No.970/PS-1/2017, dated 22-2-2019 and consequential proceedings of 4th respondent in Rc.No.9565/B5/2017, dated 22-3-2019 in contravention of the Memo issued by the 1st respondent vide Memo No.8836/SE.PS/A1/2010-33, dated 30.06.2017 and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd Respondent vide Rc.No.970/PS-1/2017, dated 22.02.2019 and consequential Memo issued by the 4th Respondent in Rc.No.9565/B5/2017, dated 22.03.2019 by directing the Respondents to pay the arrears of the salary from the date of order of appointment dated 11.08.2017 and continue to pay the salaries and pass…” 2. Ms. K. Divya, learned counsel representing Sri N. Subba Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for School Education, appearing for the respondents, is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21st July, 2025 cbn 4 152 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 5592 OF 2019 21st July, 2025 cbn