MOHAMAD ABDUL KHADIR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR
CRL.P/200927/2024 · 2025-07-09
V Srishananda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11118 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11118 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3756 CRL.P No. 200927 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.200927 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
MOHAMAD ABDUL KHADIR S/O MOHAMAD ABDUL KHADAR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. HASAN NAGAR, NEAR KHADAR GYM, RAJENDRA NAGAR, K V RANGAREDDY (T.S.), RANGAREDDY TELAGANA STATE 500030
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHARANABASAPPA K. BABSHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH, BHALKI TOWN POLICE STATION, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR REPRESENTED BY, ADDL. SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT KALABURAGI BENCH-585107.
2. SHAMENABEGUM W/O MAHAMAD ABDUL KHADIR, AGE:35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. HASSAN NAGAR, K. V. RANGAREDDY, NOW RESIDING AT BHAGWAN GALLIK, BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR- 585328.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. SANDEEP VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3756 CRL.P No. 200927 of 2024
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 498(A), 323, 504, 506 OF IPC, IN CRIME NO.114/2024 OF BHALKI TOWN P.S, PENDING BEFORE THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (J.D) AND JMFC AT BHALKI.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo, which reads as under:
“In the above case, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the case with a liberty to challenge the charge sheet to be filed by the 1st respondent, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 CT:PK