Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111177 (PAT)

Pinki Kumari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./75529/2025 · 2025-11-10

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75529 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- PIYAR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1. Pinki Kumari Daughter of Bhagya Narayan Sah Resident of Village- Govindpur Chapra P.S.- Piyar, Dist- Muzaffarpur 2. Geeta Devi @ Aarti Kumari Wife of Rajesh Sah @ Rajesh Kumar Resident of Village- Govindpur Chapra P.S.- Piyar, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 103(1), 85 and 3 (5) of the BNS. 3. As per F.I.R., all the accused persons including these petitioners killed the daughter of the informant due to non- fulfillment of the demand of dowry. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no.1 is unmarried nanad and petitioner no.2 is gotni of the deceased. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75529 of 2025(2) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 husband. Thrust of accusation is against husband of the deceased who has already in judicial custody. Petitioners are victims of over implication. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Piyar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023. AjayMishra/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T