Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1111 (HP)

RAVI PRAKASH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/21092/2025 · 2026-01-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.21024 of 2025 alongwith CWP No.21092 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd January, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.21024 of 2025 Chint Ram and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.21092 of 2025 Ravi Prakash and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhry, learned Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners seek applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioners have not preferred any representation for the redressal of their grievances raised in these writ petitions. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring a representation(s) within two weeks from today. In case such a representation(s) is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 02, 2026 Judge Mukesh 2 CWP No.1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024