Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111075 (ALL)

VANSHRAJ YADAV AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.

ABAIL/12048/2024 · 2025-02-16

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22421 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12048 of 2024 Applicant :- Vanshraj Yadav And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shadab Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shivasare Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard Sri Shadab Alam, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shivasare, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 408 of 2023, under Section 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 452, 504, 506, 120-B r/w Section 34 I.P.C., Police Station- Mehnagar, District- Azamgarh. 3. Applicant's counsel submitted that he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application on behalf of applicant Nos.2 to 5, namely, Sanjay Yadav, Dhananjay Yadav, Rahul Yadav and Ankit Maurya, as they are enlarged on regular bail. Applicant's counsel further submitted on behalf of applicant No.1, Vanshraj Yadav, that he is not pressing the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant No.1 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the informant has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant No.1. 5. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant No.1 through this application is refused. 6. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant No.1, it is directed that if applicant No.1 surrenders before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922. 7. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant No.1 before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Nitin Verma Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad