Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 111067 (ALL)

SHYAM NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/20020/2024 · 2025-02-17

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22976 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20020 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Prakash Pandey,Shubham Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Purnendu Kumar Singh Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Shashi Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Purnendu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent and learned Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner was suspended from service on 30.01.2020. The enquiry has not been concluded till date. The respondents could not establish that the enquiry was delayed by the petitioner. The suspension has continued for an inordinately long period of time. The suspension order has now become untenable. The suspension order is liable to be quashed and is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to conclude the enquiry within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad