RAJEEV BHASHKAR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A227/957/2025 · 2025-02-13
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11106 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11106 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21810 Court No. - 79 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 957 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Bhashkar And 5 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant petition has been preferred with a prayer to set aside the order dated 05.02.2020 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, basti in Case No.7196 of 2018 (Rinki Arya vs. Rajeev Bhaskar and others) as well as order dated 7.9.2024S passed by Sessions Judge, Basti in Criminal Revision No.192 of 2024 (Rajeev Bhaskar and others and other vs. State of U.P. and another).
3. Learned counsel pressed all the grounds whatsoever has been taken through the instant petition through which, it has been apprised that there is hardly any attraction of sections in which the petitioners have been summoned vide order dated 05.02.2020. Being aggrieved with the order dated 05.02.2020, petitioners preferred criminal revision before learned revisional court but the same was also rejected vide order dated 07.09.2024.
4. Learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant petition.
5. Be that as it may, no useful purpose shall be served by way of giving time for exchange of counter and rejoinder affidavits and keeping the matter pending before this Court and as such, learned Court of Special Judge, Muzaffar Nagar is hereby directed to proceed with Case No.7196 of 2018 (Rinki Arya vs. Rajeev Bhaskar and others) only in respect of petitioners nos. 2 to 6 only by way of disposing the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 12 months from today after due opportunity extended to all concerned.
6. However, it is made clear that no unnecessary adjournment shall be sought during pendency of the aforesaid complaint case unless the same is unavoidable. Petitioners nos. 2 to 6 shall be permitted to appear through counsel.
7. However, it is made clear that till the pendency of the above mentioned complaint case no coercive action shall be initiated against the petitioners nos. 2 to 6 only.
8. The instant petition is hereby disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 Rakesh Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad