Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110997 (MAD)

Ilaiyaraja v. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/27702/2025 · 2025-10-10

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 27702 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 27702 of 2025 1. Ilaiyaraja S/o.Mari, No.3/35, Perumal Koil Street, Kilvilagam Colony, Vidaiyur Post, Thiruvallur Taluk and District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No. 212 /2025). Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail on the event of arrest in connection with the Crime No. 212 /2025 on the file the respondent police station ang thus render Justice accordingly. For Petitioner(s): Srinivas M J K.Elumalai B.Kannan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27702 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b),115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS r/w. 4 of Woman Harassment Act in Crime No.212 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that due to a wordy quarrel, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant, threatened him with dire consequences and caused grievous injuries. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the victim has been discharged from the hospital and that due to previous enmity, a false complaint has been lodged. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reported that injured sustained knife injuries, and the petitioner also has 3 previous cases. He further submitted that the investigation https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27702 of 2025 in this case is pending. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5 Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, and taking note of the fact that injured sustained severe knife injuries, that the petitioner has 3 previous cases, and that the investigation in this case is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 10-10-2025 Mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Chennai. 2.State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No. 212 /2025). 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 27702 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 27702 of 2025 10-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis