2025:HHC:15466 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 7064 of 2025 Decided on : 23.05.2025 Munish Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Roop Lal Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 2. In the light of the order that the Court intends to pass on the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, as no order adverse to the private respondents is being passed, therefore, no notice has been issued to the said respondents. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:15466 3. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:- “(i) That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the Respondent No.2 & 3 to decide the complaint dated 25.06.2024 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner within a time bound manner.” 4. Without making any observation on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with the direction that if indeed any representation/complaint has been filed by the petitioner to respondents No.2 & 3, then let an appropriate call be taken thereupon by the said Authorities, in accordance of law, within a period of eight weeks from today, by adhering to the principals of natural justice. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 23, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)