Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110952 (PNJ)

MOHD. KHALID @ KHALID MALIK @ PARTAPA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/572/2025 · 2025-02-07

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 117 !) "! )( ! +* * +,-. N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE S HARYANA AT CHA /00 !"#$%&'()% Mr. $ $(& #(*& . /0& ' , ( #$2- " ! . " ! ! !#$ (*#$ ! !( ) 5 " , ( ! 1 THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH +,- 2 30 ++ 00 0 !) #( & " 4 1 6( " ( - 33 )( ",4(*" " . ** %&' " 5 * * " ! * -5 -. + 0 4 ' ( " ( MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 ) * & ,4 . ! ) " - ( / 8 9 3- / ! 3 / -3 +,-. ! ! * ) ! " ! " * *1 *"!" ! : ! ( ! / !! & ! 9! " /( * 4 ( ! -3 / 3 /( * ! 6 " )( 7 ' ( " ' , !! - /) / " ! ! ! * ! * ( * /( * * 1 " * ! ( ! " ! * * " " MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 5( ( ! Gugal and State of Har / < ! the case to ! 6 - * " 33 ) ,4 3 +,-. ! * *( ! ! " $ and others vs. State of Mysore : 19 f Haryna : 2020(2) RCR (Criminal) # (**4 /** " 6" se to 12.10.2017, the learned trial Cou 1 ! " ! * ! " $ 1 ! &"(* ** *! " ( )( (*" * 5*( * * 4 - 6" !* Gurap : 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali V nal) 339. 4 -3 /(!* However, while adjourni al Court failed to consider the fact tha ! " < * * ! & ' ' "# $ %% ! ( /0&1 ' ,( ( #$ 2 - ! ! 4( < -0 ; * urappa Ali Vs. * journing act that ' 6( " ( MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document " =2 ( < ( +++ Wheth Wheth +,-. "(" " ( " ** 2 !1 1 " . !" ! * !! hether speaking/reasoned hether reportable 5 - " ! < " " ( " ! ! *4!"( (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No - " MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document