Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2025 DAILYLAW 110952 (PNJ)
MOHD. KHALID @ KHALID MALIK @ PARTAPA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
CRM-M/572/2025 · 2025-02-07
Manisha Batra
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110952 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110952 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 117
!)
"! )( ! +*
*
+,-. N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE S HARYANA AT CHA
/00
!"#$%&'()%
Mr. $
$(&
#(*& . /0& '
,
(
#$2-
" ! . " ! ! !#$ (*#$ ! !( ) 5
" , (
! 1
THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH +,- 2 30 ++
00
0 !) #( &
" 4 1
6( " ( - 33 )(
",4(*"
"
. ** %&'
" 5 * *
" ! * -5
-. +
0 4
'
(
"
( MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
6
) * & ,4
. ! )
" - (
/
8
9
3- /
! 3 /
-3
+,-. ! ! * ) ! " ! " * *1
*"!" ! :
! ( ! /
!! &
! 9! "
/( * 4
( ! -3
/ 3 /( * ! 6 "
)( 7 '
(
"
'
, !! - /)
/
"
! ! ! * ! * ( *
/( * * 1
"
* ! (
! "
! *
*
"
"
MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
5( (
! Gugal and State of Har /
< ! the case to
! 6
-
*
"
33 ) ,4
3
+,-. ! * *( ! ! "
$ and others vs. State of Mysore : 19 f Haryna : 2020(2) RCR (Criminal) #
(**4
/**
" 6" se to 12.10.2017, the learned trial Cou 1 ! " ! * ! " $ 1 ! &"(* ** *! "
(
)( (*" * 5*( *
* 4
- 6" !* Gurap : 1969 CriLJ 826 and Shokat Ali V nal) 339. 4 -3 /(!*
However, while adjourni al Court failed to consider the fact tha ! " < * * ! & ' '
"# $ %% ! (
/0&1 '
,( (
#$ 2 -
! ! 4(
<
-0 ;
* urappa Ali Vs. *
journing act that
'
6(
" (
MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
" =2 ( <
(
+++
Wheth Wheth +,-. "("
" (
" ** 2
!1 1 "
. !" ! * !!
hether speaking/reasoned
hether reportable
5
-
" ! <
"
" (
" ! ! *4!"(
(MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
-
"
MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.02.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document