Dasari Srinivasulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7221/2021 · 2025-09-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11092 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11092 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010127142021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7221/2021 Between:
1. DASARI SRINIVASULU, S/O CHINNA THIPPANNA, AGE 46 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O K.MARKAPURAM VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KURNOOL. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, K.NAGALAPURAM POLICE STATION, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not taking action against the culprits who are freely moving in the village, as per law, consequently direct the 4th respondent to take the complaint given by the victims and act on it without altering the statements given by them and pass
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to transfer, this MLC case filed against the culprits to any other police station in Kurnool Town, pending disposal of writ petition in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to the proposed respondents 5 to 8 herein as party in WP No.7221 of 2021 as well as in IA No.1 of 2021, to meet the ends of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. R RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
R RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not taking action against the culprits who are freely moving in the village, as per law, consequently direct the 4th respondent to take the complaint given by the victims and act on it without altering the statements given by them and to pass....”
2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 4. As the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.09.2025 SNI
4
164 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.7221 of 2021
Dt.17.09.2025
SNI