HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23001 of 2024 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, as such, present writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to petitioner to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. October 6, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitin Sharma, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek, Dinesh Kumar Singh, G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Kuldeep Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad