COCP No.5427 of 202 IN TH 214-U JAI PRAKASH A MUNISH SHARM CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. S for th Mr. M HARKESH MAN 1. Mr. M joined the procee submitted by the Haryana Dholida Rights) Act, 2010 and a copy thereo 2. In vi counsel for the pe 3. Dism 4. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioners to listing of revival a February 04, 20 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De ASH AND ANOTHER Vs HARMA DEPUTY COMMISSIONE ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Shamsher Singh Tomar, Advoca for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Ha **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Mr. Munish Sharma, Deputy Comm roceedings through video-conferencin y the petitioners with respect to claim holidar, Butimar, Bhonedar and Muq t, 2010 shall be considered and decid thereof shall be communicated to them In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioners does not press the prese Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioners wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.5427 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 04.02.2025 ......Petitioners IONER CHARKHI DADRI ....Respondents ESH MANUJA dvocate G., Haryana. Commissioner, Charkhi Dadri, who erencing submits that the representatio claim of rights under the provisions o d Muqararidar (Vesting of Proprietar decided within two weeks from toda them within a week thereafter. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne e present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o s, immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 has entation sions of prietary m today learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.05 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment