DIVYANSHU RANJAN ALLIAS DEVANSHU RANJAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2516/2025 · 2025-04-25
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11089 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11089 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:12426 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2516 of 2025 ------ 1.Divyanshu Ranjan @ Devanshu Ranjan, aged about 22 years, son of Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, resident of Bhakharua More, Daudnagar, PO and PS Daudnagar, District Aurangabad (Bihar) 2.Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, aged about 51 years, son of Dayanand Singh, resident of Bhakharua More, Daudnagar, PO and PS Daudnagar, District Aurangabad (Bihar) … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shadab Bin Haque, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.PP ----- 04/ 25.04.2025 Heard the parties.
2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3), 308(3), 126(2), 329(3), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. An absolute business transaction has been given the color of criminal case. The allegation against these petitioners is that they used to purchase TMT bars from the informant and on demand amount has not been paid.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that infact the petitioners have paid excess amount to the informant and to recover the same Money Suit No. 17 of 2024 has already been filed prior to institution of this case.
2025:JHHC:12426 2
5. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the fact that civil case for recovery of money has been given color of criminal case, this Court finds it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed. The petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on the event of their surrender or arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. at Chandil, in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.214 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioner and other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his name or in the name of his ancestors in which he is having share and to that effect, he has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his share in the property.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3