Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110882 (ALL)

SIRAJ KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/42691/2024 · 2025-09-16

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42691 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Sri Ehtesham Afsar Khan, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Mohd. Sauood, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Chandra Shekhar Saran, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.847 of 2013 (State Vs. Qadir Khan and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.245 of 2012, under sections 420, 467, 468, 477, 506, IPC, Police Station Izzat Nagar, District Bareilly, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, on the basis of compromise. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ehtesham Afsar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohd Sauood Siraj Khan And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.847 of 2013 (State Vs. Qadir Khan and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.245 of 2012, under sections 420, 467, 468, 477, 506, IPC, Police Station Izzat Nagar, District Bareilly, pending before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 17, 2025 VKG A482 No. 42691 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad