Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:11562 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19707 of 2024 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Sri Kailash Nath Balika Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Singh,Shivam Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Shivam Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.K.Srivastava on behalf of respondent no.3 and Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner before this Court is a Committee of Management, Sri Kailash Nath Balika Vidyalaya Inter College through its Manager. 3. The respondent no.3 was working as a Class IV employee for the last many years in the petitioner's College. He suffered with an inquiry with certain serious allegations and was terminated from service vide order dated 23.9.2023. The matter was thereafter referred to DIOS, Kanpur Nagar for approval. By impugned order dated 26.10.2024 order of termination was interfered to the extent that the punishment was reduced for permanent stoppage of two increments taking note that the said respondent has extended a written unqualified apology. For reference, contents of said letter is scanned and pasted hereinafter: 2 3 4. Operative part of the impugned order is reproduced hereinafter: " संस्थ勉䧫 ्ቚबन्धⓢ⸅ ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ नि ्ቓय/ आदⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ निरु渵峒 ्ቦ䦂䨘 उमⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅ु म勉䧫Ⓕᯩ ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 अधोहस्त勉䧫्ቌⒻᯩ䦂䨘 ⓢ⸅勉䧫यलय म䨓宬 नि्ቛत䦂䨘य अप䦂䨘ल ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ गय䦂䨘, जि)सⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ ्ቅम म䨓宬 ⓢ⸅勉䧫य勉䧫लय ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ प्ቔ勉䧫ंⓢ⸅फ़ᮗ म勉䧫०/615-17/2024-25 निद 勉䧫ंⓢ⸅ 04.09.2024 ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 सभ䦂䨘 प्ቌሗካ ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ सु 勉䧫� ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ गय䦂䨘쪦쇕 सु 勉䧫� म䨓宬 सभ䦂䨘 प्ቌሗካ ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 निदयⓂᯛ गयⓂᯛ ⓢ⸅थ ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ आध勉䧫Ⓕᯩ पⒻᯩ प勉䧫य勉䧫 गय勉䧫 निⓢ⸅ ⓢ⸅ै ल勉䧫訁膽 勉䧫थ ब勉䧫लिलⓢ⸅勉䧫 इण्टⒻᯩ ⓢ⸅勉䧫लⓂᯛ) जिसनिल ल勉䧫इन्स ⓢ⸅勉䧫 पुⒻᯩ गⒻᯩ अ訁膽勉䧫सⓢ⸅ॏᮗय सह勉䧫यत勉䧫 ्ቚ勉䧫散屟 म勉䧫ध्यनिमⓢ⸅ नि्ቕ勉䧫लय है, जि)सम䨓宬 ⓢ⸅्ቌ勉䧫 06 सⓂᯛ 12 तⓢ⸅ ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ छ勉䧫्ቔ勉䧫य䨓宬 अध्य Ⓕᯩत है쪦쇕 प्ቔ勉䧫)तሗካ ⓢ⸅勉䧫 पⒻᯩ䦂䨘्ቌ्ቓ ⓢ⸅Ⓕᯩ Ⓜᯛ पⒻᯩ प勉䧫य勉䧫 गय勉䧫 निⓢ⸅ ्ቦ䦂䨘 उमⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅ु म勉䧫Ⓕᯩ सफ勉䧫� ⓢ⸅मच勉䧫Ⓕᯩ䦂䨘 ⓢ⸅ो अमय勉䧫निदत आचⒻᯩ्ቓ एं अ訁膽ोभ 䦂䨘य निटप्प्ቓ䦂䨘 निⓢ⸅यⓂᯛ )勉䧫 Ⓜᯛ ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ ⓢ⸅勉䧫Ⓕᯩ्ቓ एंट䦂䨘 Ⓕᯩोनिमयो ट䦂䨘म ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 चⓂᯛत勉䧫 䦂䨘 दⓂᯛतⓂᯛ हुयⓂᯛ भनिष्य म䨓宬 इस ्ቚⓢ⸅勉䧫Ⓕᯩ ⓢ⸅勉䧫 ⓢ⸅ृ त्य निⓢ⸅यⓂᯛ )勉䧫 Ⓜᯛ ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ अपⓂᯛ्ቌ勉䧫 ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ गय䦂䨘쪦쇕 संस्थ勉䧫 ्ቚध勉䧫 勉䧫च勉䧫य勉䧫 ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 勉䧫निमत )勉䧫ँच अधिधⓢ⸅勉䧫Ⓕᯩ䦂䨘 ⓢ⸅ो नि्ቕ勉䧫लय ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ शि訁膽धि्ቌⓢ⸅勉䧫ओं एं शि訁膽्ቌ्ቓⓂᯛ्ቈⒻᯩ ⓢ⸅मच勉䧫रिⒻᯩयሗካ ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 प्ቔ निदय勉䧫 गय勉䧫 निⓢ⸅ उमⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅ु म勉䧫Ⓕᯩ नि्ቕ勉䧫लय म䨓宬 訁膽Ⓕᯩ勉䧫ब प䦂䨘ⓢ⸅Ⓕᯩ आतⓂᯛ है तथ勉䧫 स勉䧫फ - सफ勉䧫� भ䦂䨘 ह⒣⸒ ⓢ⸅ⒻᯩतⓂᯛ हैं , तथ勉䧫 अमय勉䧫निदत भ勉䧫ष勉䧫 ⓢ⸅勉䧫 ्ቚयोग ⓢ⸅ⒻᯩतⓂᯛ हैं쪦쇕 जि)ससⓂᯛ पुनिKत होत勉䧫 है निⓢ⸅ ्ቦ䦂䨘 उमⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅ु म勉䧫Ⓕᯩ ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 नि्ቕ勉䧫लय म䨓宬 訁膽Ⓕᯩ勉䧫ब प䦂䨘ⓢ⸅Ⓕᯩ आ 勉䧫 अ ु訁膽勉䧫स ह䦂䨘 त勉䧫 ⓢ⸅勉䧫 परिⒻᯩच勉䧫यⓢ⸅ है쪦쇕 चूँनिⓢ⸅ नि्ቕ勉䧫लय ब勉䧫लिलⓢ⸅勉䧫 नि्ቕ勉䧫लय है , जि)सम䨓宬 ⓢ⸅्ቌ勉䧫 06 सⓂᯛ 12 तⓢ⸅ ⓢ⸅ॏᮗ छ勉䧫्ቔ勉䧫य䨓宬 अध्य Ⓕᯩत है쪦쇕 नि्ቕ勉䧫लय म䨓宬 ⓢ⸅मच勉䧫Ⓕᯩ䦂䨘 ्ቛ勉䧫Ⓕᯩ勉䧫 訁膽Ⓕᯩ勉䧫ब प䦂䨘ⓢ⸅Ⓕᯩ आ 勉䧫 तथ勉䧫 अमय勉䧫निदत भ勉䧫ष勉䧫 ⓢ⸅勉䧫 ्ቚयोग ⓢ⸅Ⓕᯩ 勉䧫 ⓢ⸅मच勉䧫Ⓕᯩ䦂䨘 आचⒻᯩ्ቓ नि यम勉䧫ल䦂䨘 ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ सथ勉䧫 निपⒻᯩ䦂䨘त है쪦쇕 ्ቦ䦂䨘 उमⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅ु म勉䧫Ⓕᯩ Ⓜᯛ अप Ⓜᯛ प्ቔ निद 勉䧫ंⓢ⸅ 14.08.2023 म䨓宬 गቖኌNतयሗካ ⓢ⸅ो स्䦂䨘ⓢ⸅勉䧫Ⓕᯩ ⓢ⸅ⒻᯩतⓂᯛ हुए म勉䧫फॏᮗ म勉䧫ंग䦂䨘 गय䦂䨘 है쪦쇕 ्ቦ䦂䨘 उमⓂᯛ訁膽 ⓢ⸅ु म勉䧫Ⓕᯩ ⓢ⸅ो म勉䧫 䦂䨘य दृनिKⓢ⸅ो्ቓ ⓢ⸅Ⓜᯛ दृनिKगत 02 Ⓜᯛत ृधि渵峒यሗካ स्थ勉䧫य䦂䨘 रूप सⓂᯛ Ⓕᯩोⓢ⸅तⓂᯛ हुयⓂᯛ सⓂᯛ勉䧫 म䨓宬 बह勉䧫ल निⓢ⸅य勉䧫 )勉䧫त勉䧫 है쪦쇕 " 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that considering nature of allegations and that respondent no.3 has accepted his acts, he requires a major penalty and it is not a case of a minor penalty. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submitted that since the respondent no.3 has extended a written unqualified apology, therefore without interfering with the impugned order, he may be given a chance to improve himself. 7. Learned Standing Counsel has supported the impugned order. 8. I have considered the above submissions and considering that the respondent no.3 is a Class IV employee who is working in the petitioner's College for more than two decades and has extended a 4 written unqualified apology, therefore, he is entitled for a chance to improve his conduct. However, in case a subsequent complaint is made against him or he commits any act of moral turpitude, in that concerned College which is a girls College, he can suffer a major penalty. 9. In order to ensure that respondent no.3 may not repeat such act, he should submit a written undertaking that he will do his work diligently and will not disturb other persons unnecessary and in case any trouble is created by him, petitioner's Committee of Management will be at liberty to even initiate a criminal proceeding against him alongwith disciplinary proceeding. 10. With the aforesaid observations/direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.1.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad