DEVICHARAN AND ORS v. THE CHAIRMAN, PNB, NEW DELHI
CW/2732/2007 · 2025-01-28
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11086 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11086 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2732/2007
1. Devicharan S/o Lalaram, R/o Village Jahan Nagar Teh- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj.
2. Thakurdas S/o Lalaram, R/o Village Jahan Nagar, Teh- Rupwas, Distt. Bharatpur Raj.
3. Subhash S/o Lalaram, R/o Village Jahan Nagar, Teh- Rupwas, Distt.- Bharatpur Raj.
4. Veer Bahadur S/o Lalaram, R/o Village Jahan Nagar, Teh.- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj.
5. Prakash Chand S/o Lalaram, R/o Village Jahan Nagar, Teh- Rupwas Distt- Bharatpur Raj. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The Chairman Punjab National Bank, 7, Bhikamaji Palace, New Delhi.
2. The Manager, Punjab National Bank, Khanua, Uchchain, Teh- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj.
3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Magistrate), Teh- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj.
4. The Acm, Teh- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj.
5. Tehsildar, Teh- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj.
6. The Collector, Teh- Rupwas, Distt- Bharatpur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anupama Parashar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena for Mr. O.P. Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 28/01/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:3974] (2 of 2) [CW-2732/2007]
Learned counsel for the respondents-bank submits that this writ petition is rendered infructuous as they have already recovered the loan amount.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid statement. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /88