APHC010127242011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. GANGASANI KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY R/O. CHALLAGARIGA VILLAGE ATCHAMPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 1. CHERUKURU PUSPA LAKSHMI AND ANOTHER, W/O. E.HARI BABU R/O. UPPALAPADU VILLAGE PEDAKAKANI MANDAL DISTRICT 2. STATE OF A P, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SRINIVAS 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1378 OF 2011 GANGASANI KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY R/O. CHALLAGARIGA VILLAGE ATCHAMPET MANDAL, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND CHERUKURU PUSPA LAKSHMI AND ANOTHER, W/O. E.HARI BABU R/O. UPPALAPADU VILLAGE PEDAKAKANI MANDAL STATE OF A P, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the nCase, the High Court may be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO GANGASANI KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY R/O. CHALLAGARIGA VILLAGE ATCHAMPET MANDAL, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER CHERUKURU PUSPA LAKSHMI AND ANOTHER, W/O. E.HARI BABU R/O. UPPALAPADU VILLAGE PEDAKAKANI MANDAL GUNTUR STATE OF A P, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the judgment dated 25.03.2011 passed in Crl.A.No.382 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Guntur, confirming the judgment in C.C.No.120 of 2008, passed by the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Prohibition and Excise, Guntur, dated 31.5.2010. 2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner and respondent are present. 3. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that no further adjudication is necessary as parties have already settled the matter out of Court. 4. By recording the said submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as adjudication is not required due to settlement of the matter outside the Court. 5. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as settled out of Court. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 19.9.2025 TJN 505 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1378 OF 2011 Dated: 19.9.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1378 OF 2011 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 19.9.2025 TMR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as settled out of Court. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J TJN