HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3889/2025 1. Girdhari Lal Mittal, Son Of Kishan Lal Mittal, Resident Of 33/106, Neelam Path (Varun Path), Mansarovar, Jaiopur.-302020. 2. Gokul Prasad Sharma, Son Of Late Shri Kamal Ji Sharma, Resident Of 31/54/01, Neelam Path (Varun Path), Mansarovar, Jaipur. 3. Naveen Kumar Gupta, Son Of Late Shri Krishan Kumar Gupta, Resident Of 31/54/04, Neelam Path (Varun Path), Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Jaipur Greater Municipal Corporation, Through Its Commissioner, Pandit Dindayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Tonk Road, Lalkothi,jaipur.-302015. 2. The Municipal Corporation Zone Mansarovar, Through Its Deputy Commissioner, Mansarovar Zone, Jaipur. 3. M/s. Netfra Solutions Private Limited, Registered Address Is House Nob- 34, Amanpuri, Nangloi, Delhi, West Delhi-110041, Delhi. 4. Gajraj Son Of Late Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Resident Of H. No. 33/107, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302020. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rudraksh Sharma For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/05/2025 1. By way of filing this petition, the petitioners are seeking directions against the respondents to remove the installed mobile tower. (2 of 3) [CW-3889/2025] 2. It has been apprised at Bar that the matter is subjudice before the Committee headed by District Magistrate, Jaipur since November, 2021. 3. Counsel submits that till date, the complaint submitted by the residents of the colony has not been decided by the said Committee, so appropriate directions be issued to the Committee concerned to decide the complaint expeditiously within a time frame. 4. In the considered opinion of this Court, installation of mobile tower is governed by the order dated 06.02.2017 issued by the State Government. In the said order dated 06.02.2017, Clause 15(4) clearly provides that the District Telecom Committee (DTC) under the Chairmanship of District Collector concerned shall deal with the issue related to telecom infrastructure including public grievance for installation of tower etc. 5. Since the petitioners have already approached the authority concerned by way of filing an application under Clause 15(4) of the order dated 06.02.2017 for redressal of his grievance on 09.12.2022 but inspite of passing of a considerable time, till date, the said application filed by the petitioners has not been decided. 6. Considering the above limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the Chairperson of the Committee to decide the application (pending, if any), strictly in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing (3 of 3) [CW-3889/2025] to all the respective parties, expeditiously as early as possible, not beyond the period of three month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 7. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/322