Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11084 (PNJ)

VIR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/941/2021 · 2025-07-08

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-941-2021 (O&M) & -1- other connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118+257 (09 Cases) CWP-941-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision :08.07.2025 Vir Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CWP-950-2021 (O&M) Priya ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CWP-1024-2021 (O&M) Mandeep Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CM-9445-CWP-2025 in/& CWP-11487-2020 (O&M) Amrit Pal Singh & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.09 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-941-2021 (O&M) & -2- other connected cases CWP-730-2021 (O&M) Sohan Lal @ Soni Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CWP-704-2021 (O&M) Dhalwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents COCP-1223-2021 Sohan Lal @ Soni Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Inderjit Singh ...Respondent COCP-5257-2024 Vir Singh ...Petitioner Versus Kushaldeep Singh Randhawa ...Respondent AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.09 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-941-2021 (O&M) & -3- other connected cases COCP-1079-2025 Mandeep Singh ...Petitioner Versus Devinder Pal Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWP-11487-2020 & CWP-1024-2021. Mr. Kanwar Pahul Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s) in CWPs-950-2021 & 730-2021. Mr. Ashok Goel, Advocate for the petitioner in COCP-1079-2025. Mr. T.P.S. Chawla, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Chanderdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.4 in CWP-11487-2020. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that keeping in view the latest judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.14831-2024 titled as Jaggo vs. Union of India and others, decided on 20.12.2024, the petitioner(s) intends to approach the respondents by way of filing a representation for the grant of benefit of reinstatement/regularization in service as well as minimum of the pay scale and prays that the respondents be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound manner by passing an appropriate speaking order. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case, any AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.09 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-941-2021 (O&M) & -4- other connected cases representation is received from the petitioner(s), the same will be considered by the respondents keeping in view the settled principle of law in Jaggo (supra), as well as the service conditions governing the petitioner(s) and an appropriate speaking order will be passed within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of any such representation and in case, the claim regarding reinstatement/regularization in service as well as the grant of minimum pay scale of the petitioner(s) is found to be genuine and is covered under the settled principle of law settled in Jaggo (supra), the said relief will be granted to the petitioner(s) otherwise, due reasons for not accepting the claim of the petitioner(s) will be mentioned in the speaking order so passed, which order will be conveyed to the petitioner(s) for their information and necessary action. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that as some of the petitioner(s) are already continuing in service under the interim order of this Court hence, till the decision of the representation to be filed by the petitioner(s) , such petitioner(s) be allowed to continue in service. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case, any representation is filed by the petitioner(s) within a period of 10 days from today, the petitioners, who have interim order in their favour, will be allowed to continue in service, till the decision of the said representation. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that though, the petitioners were continuing in service but they have not been paid salary. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the said grievance will also be adjudicated in case the same is part of the representation to be filed by the petitioner(s). AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.09 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-941-2021 (O&M) & -5- other connected cases 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, present writ petitions and contempt petitions may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty as prayed for. 8. Ordered accordingly. 9. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of. 10. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected cases. July 08, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.09 12:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document