Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11079 (UTT)

LALIT SINGH JYALA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2234/2020 · 2025-06-12

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4897 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2234 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has expired. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Therefore, the same is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Interim order dated 31.12.2020 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 12.06.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f 9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A8 3D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.06.13 15:07:41 +05'30'