Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010082722025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1512/2025 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3 MIDDLETON STREET, KOLKATA- 700071, AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-5, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI VERSUS ABU SAYED SARKAR AND 4 ORS S/O-LATE ABDUL AZIZ @ ABDUL AZIZ SARKAR, R/O- FANCY VALLEY, TURA, DISTRICT-WEST GARO HILLS, MEGHALAYA 2:ANISA BEGUM D/O. LT. ABDUL AZIZ @ ABDUL AZIZ SARKAR R/O. BILASIPARA TOWN P/O. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 3:MAHFOOZUR RAHMAN S/O. LT. ABDUL AZIZ @ ABDUL AZIZ SARKAR R/O. BEPARIPATTY P/O. GAURIPUR DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 4:S. RAVI KUMAR S/O. SRINIVASA REDDY R/O. 2/10 KOGUR POST SARJAPURAM VIA BANGLORE KARNATAKA Page No.# 2/3 5:B. S. SHANMUGOM S/O. SIDDANAJAPPA R/O. BAGALUR HOSUR TALUK DIST. DHARAMOPURI TAMUILNADU-635109 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J BARMAN, MS P PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD 3 MIDDLETON STREET KOLKATA-700071 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-5 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE GUWAHATI VERSUS ABU SAYED SARKAR AND 4ORS S/O-LATE ABDUL AZIZ ALIAS ABDUL AZIZ SARKAR R/O-FANCY VALLEY TURA DISTRICT-WEST GARO HILLS MEGHALAYA ------------ Advocate for : MR PRANABJYOTI BARMAN Advocate for : appearing for ABU SAYED SARKAR AND 4ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 16.05.2025 Learned counsel, Mr. P.J. Barman is present for the applicant - National Insurance Company Ltd., who has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with prayer of condonation of delay of 5 days in preferring the connected appeal. The applicant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 30.12.2024 passed by the learned M.A.C.T., Dhubri in MAC Case No. 195/2012. It is submitted that delay was owing to the formalities that had to be undertaken by the Insurance Company. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant. Sufficient grounds have been shown. It appears that the delay was not intentional. For the interest of justice, delay of 5 days is hereby condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal. In term of the above observations, I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant