Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11075 (AP)

GADIRAJU SRINIVASA RAJU v. THATIKONDA VENKATA RADHA KUMAR & ANOTHER

CRLRC/806/2010 · 2025-06-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: SOfi OF 9nin Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Judgment of the Prrncipal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhimavaram in CC. No. 13 of 2008, dated 04-02-2010. Between: Gadiraju Srinivasa Raju, S/o Venkata Krishna Bhimavaram, Bhimavaram. Raju, 33 Years, Business, R/o rep. by his GPA Holder Gadiraju Venkatakrishnam Raju, ...Petitioner/ Complainant AND 1. Thatikonda Venkata Radha Kumar S/o Krishna Rao, Business,37 Years, R/o F-3, Swarna Soudha Apartments, Opp: Raghu College Visakhapatnam -3 Ramanagar, ...Accused rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh A.P., at Amaravati ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI I. V. Counsel for the Respondents No.2: The Court made the following: N. RAJU PUBLIC PROSECUTOR / 4- # APHC010126732010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] ■ i ■JK TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE / PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 806/2010 Between: ...PETITIONER Gadiraju Srinivasa Raju AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Thatikonda Venkata Radha Kumar and others Counsel for the Petitioner: \ X \ IV N Raju Counsel for the Respondent(S): X Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri I.V.N. Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the revision case inasmuch as he could not serve the notice on the 1®* respondent in spite of his best efforts. He submits that the learned Trial Court imposed only Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) towards the fine and out of that amount Rs.8,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand Only) was ordered as compensation to the petitioner/complainant in a cheque 2 \ \ Crl.R.C.No.806 o, Dated 17.06.i;^' \ bounce case where the value of the cheque is Rs. 1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Seventy Five Thousand Only). Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and 2. the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the petition that he has withdrawn the matter. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR ^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER u ■ .a To, • i' . Judicial First Class 1. The .Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Magistrate, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. (With Records) 2. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 3. One CC to SRI I. V. N. Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies MV RAM - ^ \ HIGH COURT DATED: 17/06/2025 \ ORDER CRLRC.No.806 of 2010 dismissing the CRLRC AS WITHDRAWN