IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3497 of 2022 Date of Decision: 5.5.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Neeraj Chandel and Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr.Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent/State. Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, he be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh. 2. Ordered accordingly. May 5, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge