IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (168) RA-CW-76-2025 in CWP-14736-2024 Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 Union of India & others --Applicant/respondent no.1 Versus Ex. Gnr.(DMT) Pritam Singh & another --Non-applicant/petitioner CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA. Present:- Mr. Y.P. Singla, Advocate for the applicant/respondent no.1. Mr. D.C. Mittal, Advocate for non-applicant/petitioner. *** LISA GILL.J (Oral) Applicant-respondent no.1 seeks review of decision dated 27.11.2024 passed in CWP-14736-2024, whereby order dated 24.09.2019 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chandigarh was quashed and set aside. Having heard learned counsel, in our considered opinion, learned counsel for applicant-respondent no.1 merely seeks to reargue the matter afresh. He is unable to point out any error apparent on the face of it or any other ground which calls for review of decision dated 27.11.2024. It is a settled position that Court's jurisdiction to review its judgement is limited and has to be exercised within the framework of Section 114 read with Order 47 CPC. Gainful reference in this respect can be made to LUCKY 2025.07.18 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court chandigarh RA-CW-76-2025 in -2- CWP-14736-2024 judgements of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Parsion Devi and others Vs. Sumitri Devi & others, 1997(8) SCC 715, Ashrafi Devi through L.Rs Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2019(5) SCC 86 and Shri Ram Sahu through L.Rs and others Vs. Vinod Kumar Rawat and others AIR Online 2020 SC 813. In the given factual matrix, we do not find any ground which calls for review of decision dated 27.11.2024. Application is accordingly dismissed. (LISA GILL) JUDGE 11.07.2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) lucky JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No LUCKY 2025.07.18 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court chandigarh