Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110695 (ALL)

SUDHIR KUMAR GOYAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/42907/2024 · 2025-09-14

Kshitij Shailendra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42907 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Vinay Kumar, holding brief of Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-opposite party No. 1 and Shri Giriraj Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing the entire proceedings of Case No. 6625 of 2024 (State vs. Sudhir Kumar Goyal) arising out of Case Crime No. 10 of 2024, under Section 420 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bulandshahr pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. An interim order was passed by this Court on 22.01.2025 staying further proceedings of the aforesaid case taking note of the fact that the parties have settled the dispute. 5. Certified copy of duly verified compromise by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr has been annexed as Annexure SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. 6. Considering the nature of allegations as well as factum of amicable settlement between the parties and in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another (2012) 10 SCC 303 as well as Nikhil Merchant vs Central Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Giriraj Pandey Sudhir Kumar Goyal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and another .....Opposite Party(s) Bureau of Investigation, 2008 (9) SCC 677, as continuance of criminal case would amount to wastage of precious time and resources of judicial system, the present application deserves to be allowed. 7. Accordingly, the instant application stands allowed. 8. The proceedings of aforesaid case against the applicant are hereby quashed. September 15, 2025 Sazia A482 No. 42907 of 2024 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad