252 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** COCP-5394-2024 Date of decision : 26.09.2025 Amarpreet Singh Multani ... Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kumar Arya and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Amit Kumar Bansal, Advocate for Mr.Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Partap Singh Brar, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Ravinder Kaur, Advocate for Mr.B.S. Jaswal, Advocate for respondent no.6. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel has submitted that in the present case, the dispute between the parties is primarily civil dispute and even civil litigation is pending between the parties and there is an interim order passed in the said civil proceedings. It is submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the same, in case, any cause still survives. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE September 26, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.09.26 18:30 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment