Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110604 (PAT)

Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sanjeev Kumar Singh

MA/485/2023 · 2025-10-17

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.485 of 2023 ====================================================== Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Through the Chief Regional Manager and the constituted Attorney, Regional Office, National Insurance Company Ltd., 4th floor, Sone Bhawan, B. C. Patel marg, P.S.- Sachivalaya, Distt.-Patna. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Sanjeev Kumar Singh Son of Ram Naresh Pd. Singh, Resident of Village- Karja, P.S.- Karja, District- Muzaffarpur, Pin code- 843143. 2. Md. Raja Khan S/o Late Rahamatulla Khan, Resident of 56 Beck Bagan Row, P.S- Karaya, District- Kolkata, Pincode- 700017. (Owner of the vehicle Tanker Bearing regn. no.- WB23B-9426) ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Singh Vikram, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 6 17-10-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): against the Judgment & award dated-19-01-2023 & 30-01-2023 respectively passed by the Id. Addl. District and sessions Judge - XII cum Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No. 12, Muzaffarpur in Claim Case no. 80 of 2012 whereby the claim of the claimant has been allowed and the o.p. no :-2- National Insurance Company Itd. has been directed to make payment of amount of Rs. 10,28,000/- by 31 March,2023 in favour of the claimants Patna High Court MA No.485 of 2023(6) dt.17-10-2025 2/2 with an interest @7% per annum with effect from 27-02-2012 till realized. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The statutory amount, if any, has to be returned to the appellant. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U