218-a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.90 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 28, 2025 Phuman Singh …Pe22oner Versus Surjan Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Lavish Arora, Advocate for the respondent. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:- “There is no representaon on behalf of the appellant. In the interest of jusce, adjourned to 28.01.2025. Inmaon to the counsel for the appellant be sent for the date fixed, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.” Today again there is no representa#on on behalf of the pe##oner. In compliance of the aforesaid order, in#ma#on to Shri K.S. Brar and Sh. G.S. Punia, Advocates for the pe##oner was sent, as reported by the Registry. S#ll, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the pe##oner. In the circumstances, it is apparent that the pe##oner is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. Dismissed in default for want of prosecu#on. January 28, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.01.29 10:13 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order