Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110583 (MAD)

M/S.VENKAT LEATHER EXPORTS, v. DEEPA

CRL OP/224/2025 · 2025-01-07

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.01.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 M/s.Venkat Leather Exports Rep. by its Proprietor K.Manivannan No.16, 3rd Street, Sripuram Thiruneermalai Road, Chrompet Chennai - 600 044 ... Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Deepa ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate-cum-District Munsif to complete the trial expeditiously in S.T.C.No.218 of 2023 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-cum-District Munsif at Pallavaram within a stipulated time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.R.P.Rajkumar Alagesh 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate-cum-District Munsif, Pallavaram to complete the trial expeditiously in S.T.C.No.218 of 2023 within a stipulated time frame. 2. Since no adverse order is being passed against the respondent, notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and a direction may be issued to the trial Court to dispose of the case in S.T.C.No.218 of 2023 within a stipulated time frame. 4. It would be appropriate to note that since thousands of cases are pending in the Courts and the litigants are awaiting in a long queue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra in Criminal Appeal No.4758 of 2024 dated 25.11.2024 has observed that the High Courts are fixing a time-bound schedule 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 for conclusion of the trials in a routine manner despite the decisions of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2024) 6 SCC 267, which reads as under "47.3. constitutional courts, in the ordinary course, should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the disposal of cases pending before any other courts. Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time-bound disposal of cases only in exceptional circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts concerned where the cases are pending." 5. In view of the above decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court is not inclined to fix any specific time limit, however, the learned Judicial Magistrate-cum-District Munsif, Pallavaram is directed to dispose the case in S.T.C.No.218 of 2023 as early as possible. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 6. With the above observations, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 07.01.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ksa-2 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 To The Judicial Magistrate-cum-District Munsif Pallavaram 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN. J. Ksa-2 Crl.O.P.No.224 of 2025 07.01.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis