CHAUDHARI GAJANAN PRATAP PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/41183/2024 · 2025-01-31
Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110578 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110578 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14307-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41183 of 2024 Petitioner :- Chaudhari Gajanan Pratap Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Nayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has made the following prayers :-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondent No.2 to enquire the mater and to take appropriate action/ decision on the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.11.2019 within span of time as may be granted by this Hon'ble Court (annexed as annexure No.8 to this writ petition). II. Issue any other writ, order or direction in which this Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case; in favour of the Petitioner."
3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the District Magistrate, Chandauli/ District Level Committee being respondent No.2 should be directed to decide the complaint/representation of the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the complaint/representation of the petitioner dated November 13, 2019 within a period of sixteen weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 DKS Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad