[2025:JHHC:17952] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.295 of 2024 ------ Ram Udar Goswami, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Goswami Narendra Nath, resident of Qr. No.2185, Sector-XII/E, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Sector-XII, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Land Revenue Department, Project Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa (Hatia), District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro Camp-II, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Sector-I, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro (Jharkhand) 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Chas, I.T.I. More, P.O. and P.S. Chas, District Bokaro (Jharkhand) 4. The Divisional Forest Officer (Sri. P.R. Nayadu), Bokaro Forest Divisional Office, Bokaro, situated at Kamaldih, Chas Purulia Road, P.O. and P.S. Chas, District Bokaro 5. The Officer In-charge of Sector-XII P.S., Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S. Sector-XII, Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rama Kant Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, GA V Ms. Moushmi Chatterjee, AC to GA V ------ Order No:-04 Dated:-04-07-2025 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 to its original file, which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioner with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that by mistake of mind, the said proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioner with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA) could not be filed within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 15.02.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list W.P. (C) No.3486 of 2017 before the concerned Bench after a week. This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/