COCP-265 109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Haryana Telecom Limited, Rohtak Sh.D. Suresh, IAS, CA, HSVP and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, mail/ communication dated 29.01.2025 received from the office of Estate Officer, HUDA, Rohtak, which reads as under: In view thereof, learned counsel for the res that the interest on the delayed disbursal of the amount in terms of the Writ Court order shall be released in favour of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. 2. does not press the present petition. 265-2019 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: M/s Haryana Telecom Limited, Rohtak VERSUS Sh.D. Suresh, IAS, CA, HSVP and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr. Ankit Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl.A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents relies upon an e mail/ communication dated 29.01.2025 received from the office of Estate Officer, HUDA, Rohtak, which reads as under: “It is intimated that the issue of payment of interest on the EDC amount paid to the petition be sent to the competent authority for decision. You are requested to apprise the Hon’ble High Court about the same and get the matter adjourned for four weeks, so that needful may be done accordingly.” In view thereof, learned counsel for the res that the interest on the delayed disbursal of the amount in terms of the Writ Court order shall be released in favour of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 265-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.01.2025 M/s Haryana Telecom Limited, Rohtak ...Petitioner another ...Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ankit Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl.A.G., Haryana. counsel for the respondents relies upon an e mail/ communication dated 29.01.2025 received from the office of Estate Officer, HUDA, Rohtak, which reads as under:- “It is intimated that the issue of payment of interest on the EDC amount paid to the petitioner will be sent to the competent authority for decision. You are requested to apprise the Hon’ble High Court about the same and get the matter adjourned for four weeks, so that needful may be done accordingly.” In view thereof, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the interest on the delayed disbursal of the amount in terms of the Writ Court order shall be released in favour of the petitioner within In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner ...Respondents counsel for the respondents relies upon an e- mail/ communication dated 29.01.2025 received from the office of “It is intimated that the issue of payment of er will be sent to the competent authority for decision. You are requested to apprise the Hon’ble High Court about the same and get the matter adjourned for four pondents submits that the interest on the delayed disbursal of the amount in terms of the Writ Court order shall be released in favour of the petitioner within In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.30 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document COCP-265 3. 4. 5. stand disposed of 6. aforementioned period, as per th be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/ petitioner towards date of listing of revival application. 29.01.2025 sanjay 265-2019 (O&M) [2] Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. .01.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the e undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No y, shall also However, in case the needful is not done within the e undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.30 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document