IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Shanti Saroop Sharma and another State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. triggered prosecution against the petitioners, i.e. 05.10.2024 Division No.8, District Jalandhar, has since been qua Bench vide order dated 22.01.2025 passed in CRM the cause raised herein has become infructuous. 2. aforesaid subsequent development. 3. August 18, 2025 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Shanti Saroop Sharma and another Versus State of Punjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE Mr. Kashav Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that FIR, which triggered prosecution against the petitioners, i.e. 05.10.2024, under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Division No.8, District Jalandhar, has since been qua Bench vide order dated 22.01.2025 passed in CRM the cause raised herein has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the State of Punjab does not dispute the aforesaid subsequent development. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as infructuous. August 18, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64860-2024 Date of decision : 18.08.2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE , Advocate, Vipin Pal Yadav, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. ( Oral ) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that FIR, which triggered prosecution against the petitioners, i.e. FIR No. 192 dated under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Division No.8, District Jalandhar, has since been quashed by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 22.01.2025 passed in CRM-M-65414-2025, and thus, the cause raised herein has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the State of Punjab does not dispute the ly, the petition stands dismissed as infructuous. ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE Yes/No Yes/No 2024 08.2025 …….Petitioners ….Respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that FIR, which No. 192 dated under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, registered at Police Station ordinate 2025, and thus, Learned counsel for the State of Punjab does not dispute the NAROTAM DASS 2025.08.18 19:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment