PAVITHRA v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/27824/2025 · 2025-10-13
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110440 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110440 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.27824 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.27824 of 2025 Pavithra ... Petitioner/ A3 Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Ennore Police Station, Tiruvallur District. (Crime No.603 of 2025) ... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in pending investigation in Crime No.603 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr. V.Sukumar For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath
Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *******
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.09.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 108, 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.603 of 2025, registered on the file respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.27824 of 2025
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant's sister was having 7 goats and in the house, and on 01.09.2025, the goats were found missing and on 02.09.2025, while searching the goats found that the accused Suresh was having the goats of the de-facto complainant, thus the de-facto complainant along with his sister, went to the house of accused Suresh and asked about the goats, enraged over that, the A1, and his wife, the petitioner herein and his brother, abused the de-facto complainant and his sister in filthy language and assaulted her and also abetted her to commit suicide, having humiliated, the de-facto complainant's sister committed suicide on the same day, based on the complaint, F.I.R was registered. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case. He further submitted that the investigation is not yet 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.27824 of 2025 completed. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the petitioner has no previous antecedents, and taking note of the fact that the co-accused was granted anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvottiyur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019'].
The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.27824 of 2025 [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10:30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 13.10.2025 nvi Note :
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this
order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.27824 of 2025 noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
1. The Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvottiyur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Ennore Police Station, Tiruvallur District.
3. The Special prison for Women at Puzhal.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR,J., nvi 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.27824 of 2025 Crl.O.P. No.27824 of 2025 13.10.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis