Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11044 (CHH)

VANDANA DATTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1718/2025 · 2025-03-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12204 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1718 of 2025 1 - Vandana Datta D/o Late Shri B.N. Datta Aged About 52 Years Through The Legal Guardian Sapan Kumar Datta R/o New Shanti Nagar Street No. 1- C Behind Lavanya Beauty Parlour Police Station Civil Line District - Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Excise Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Joint Director Fund Account And Pension Bastar Division Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 3 - Joint Divisional Director Treasury Bastar District - Bastar (C.G.) 4 - District Treasury Officer Bastar District - Bastar (C.G.) 5 - District Excise Officer District - Bastar (C.G.) 6 - The Collector Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 7 - Upper Collector Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Purnendra Khichariya, Advocate For State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.03 11:25:45 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 11/03/2025 1. By the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “10.1. That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent authority to release the pensionary benefit in favour of petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and may further pleased to direct the respondent authority to pay the amount of arrears of due which has not been granted to the petitioner dated 21.04.2021 till today. 10.3 Any other relief (s) that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant in the interest of Justice.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that they are going to consider the case of the petitioner and there is likelihood that order will be passed in favour of the petitioner within a period of 60 days. 3. In case, the order is not passed as stated by learned counsel for the State, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move a fresh petition in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh